Organoleptic Assessment, Protein Content, and Fat Content of Broiler Chicken Eggs Soaked in Mangosteen Peel Extract (Garcinia mangostana L.) During Storage

Ni Ketut Etty Suwitari (1), Ni Ketut Sri Rukmini (2), Ni Made Defy Janurianti (3)
(1) Animal Husbandry Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University. Indonesia
(2) Animal Husbandry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Indonesia
(3) Food Technology and Agriculture Product Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University. Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Suwitari, N. K. E., Rukmini, N. K. S., & Janurianti, N. M. D. (2025). Organoleptic Assessment, Protein Content, and Fat Content of Broiler Chicken Eggs Soaked in Mangosteen Peel Extract (Garcinia mangostana L.) During Storage. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 9(3), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v9i3.775

The purpose of this study was to determine the organoleptic assessment, protein content, and fat content of broiler chicken eggs soaked in mangosteen peel extract (Garcinia mangostana L.) during storage. The research design used was a completely randomized design factorial pattern consisting of 2 factors. The first factor was the mangosteen peel extract solution with different concentrations (0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%). The second factor was storage for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. The data obtained were analyzed for diversity using an ANOVA test, and if a significant effect was found (P <0.05), then the analysis continued with Duncan's test. The treatment of mangosteen peel extract concentration level did not affect the protein content, fat content, and organoleptic assessment of chicken eggs. Meanwhile, storage time had a very significant effect (P <0.01) on the protein content and fat content of chicken eggs. The protein content of chicken eggs in the treatment with a mangosteen peel concentration level ranged from 8.43% to 8.58%. The highest protein content was obtained on the 4th day of storage, namely 8.76%. The fat content of chicken eggs ranged from 4.33 to 4.51%. The lowest fat content was obtained on the 4-day storage treatment, namely 4.04%. Soaking chicken eggs in mangosteen peel extract and egg storage for up to 4 weeks did not have a significant effect on the organoleptic properties of chicken eggs.


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 1: No Poverty
SDG 2: Zero Hunger
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being

[1] Jazil, N., Hintono, A., & Mulyani, S. (2013). Penurunan Kualitas Telur Ayam Ras dengan Intensitas Warna Coklat Kerabang Berbeda Selama Penyimpanan. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan

[2] Rahmawati, S., Setyawati, T. R. Dan Yanti. A. P. 2014. Daya simpan dan kualitas telur ayam ras dilapisi minyak kelapa kapur sirih dan ekstrak etanol kelopak rosella. Fakultas MIPA Universitas Tanjung Pura. Vol. 3(1) : 55-60

[3] Sudaryani,T. 2006. Kualitas telur. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta

[4] Triawan, D. A., Desenze, T., Notriawan, D., dan Ernis, G. 2021. Pengawetan Telur Ayam Ras Dengan Perendaman Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji (Psidium guajava) pada Suhu Ruang. Rafflesia Journal of Natural and Applies Sciences. Vol. 1(2): 90-98

[5] Sihombing, R. 2013. Pengaruh Lama Penyimpanan terhadap Kualitas Internal Telur Ayam Ras pada Fase Kedua. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Lampung. Bandar Lampung

[6] Pramudita,., H. Juliansyah, and M. A. Rizki, “Ekstrak Kulit Manggis ( Garcinia Mangostana L ) Sebagai Inhibitor Korosi Baja Lunak ( Mild Steel ) Dalam Larutan H 2 SO 4 1 M,” pp. 1–8, 2014

[7] Sakinah, A. N., M. N. Amin, and Purwanto, “Potensi Rebusan Kulit Buah Manggis Alami (Garcinia mangostana Linn) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Mikrobisida Sel Neutrofil terhadap Streptococcus mutans,” e-Jurnal Pustaka Kesehatan, vol. 3(no. 1), pp. 134–139, 2015

[8] Nuro, M.Z., R.E. Mudawaroch, F. Iskandar. 2021. Pengaruh Level Rendaman Ekstrak Kulit Manggis (Garcia Mangostana L ) dan Daya Simpan terhadap Kualitas Fisik Telur Ayam Ras. JRAP (Jurnal Riset Agribisnis dan Peternakan). 6 (2) : 26-36

[9] Fadilah, U,F, Sudjatinah dan A. Sampurno.2019. Pengaruh Perbedaan Lama Penyimpanan Pada Suhu Ruang Terhadap Sifat Fisik, Kimia, Dan Fungsional Protein Telur Ayam Ras.Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian. 1 (1).https://repository.usm.ac.id/detail-jurnalmahasiswa-224.html

[10] Purwaningsih, D, M.A Djaelani, dan T.R Saraswati. 2016. Kualitas Telur Ayam Ras Setelah Pemberian Olesan Lidah Buaya (Aloe vera) dan Lama Penyimpanan Waktu yang Berbeda. Skripsi. Fakultas Sains dan Matematika. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang

[11] Cherian, G. Nutrition and metabolism in poultry: role of lipids in early diet. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 6, 28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0029-9

[12] Muscella, A., Stefàno, E., Lunetti, P., Capobianco, L., & Marsigliante, S. (2020). The Regulation of Fat Metabolism During Aerobic Exercise. Biomolecules, 10(12), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121699

[13] Yimenu, S. M., Koo, J., Kim, J. Y., Kim, J. H., & Kim, B. S. (2018). Kinetic modeling impacts of relative humidity, storage temperature, and air flow velocity on various indices of hen egg freshness. Poultry science, 97(12), 4384–4391. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey334

[14] Nova, Ilmia, et al. 2014. Pengaruh Lama Penyimpanan Terhadap Kualitas Internal Telur Ayam Ras Pada Fase Produksi Pertama. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, vol. 2, no. 2, doi:10.23960/jipt.v2i2.478.

[15] Saleh, M., & Lee, Y. (2023). Instrumental Analysis or Human Evaluation to Measure the Appearance, Smell, Flavor, and Physical Properties of Food. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 12(18), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183453

[16] Yves Didier Mboma Nseme, Kevin Fabrice Paul Mandeng, Jafarou Mounpou, Imelda Lucresse Nouteza Djuikoo, Maxwell Wandji Nguedjo, Roger Moïse Mbanga Baleba, Hippolyte Tene Mouafo, and Gabriel Nama Medoua. 2022. “Bioactive Compounds from Mangosteen Fruit Peels (Garcinia Mangostana L.) and Assessment of Their Antioxidant Potential”. Microbiology Research Journal International 32 (11-12):40–52. https://doi.org/10.9734/mrji/2022/v32i111354.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.