Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Chitosan and Coconut Shell Liquid Smoke Against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli

Odilia Emeralda Dian Artika (1), Ratna Yulistiani (2)
(1) Food Technology Department, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Food Technology Department, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Artika, O. E. D., & Yulistiani, R. (2025). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Chitosan and Coconut Shell Liquid Smoke Against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 9(3), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v9i3.811

This study aimed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of chitosan and coconut shell liquid smoke against S. aureus and E. coli cultures. The treatments consisted of varying concentrations of Chitosan (0%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%) and liquid smoke (0%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%) applied to S. aureus and E. coli cultures in vitro using nutrient broth medium. The bacterial populations were quantified after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, with an initial concentration of 10? CFU/mL. The results indicated that both chitosan and coconut shell liquid smoke exhibited a stronger bactericidal effect against S. aureus than E. coli. The minimum inhibitory concentration of Chitosan against S. aureus was 1%, resulting in a reduction of 2.16 log cycles, whereas the MIC against E. coli was 2%, corresponding to a reduction of 1.47 log cycles. Meanwhile, the minimum inhibitory concentration of coconut shell liquid smoke against S. aureus was 1% (reducing 1.542 log cycles), and against E. coli was 1.5% (reducing 2.02 log cycles).


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

[1] Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2024, April 2). BPOM Temukan 102 Sampel Takjil Tidak Memenuhi Syarat. Retrieved from BPOM Temukan 102 Sampel Takjil Tidak Memenuhi Syarat | Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan.

[2] Anggraini, S. P. A., & Susy, Y. (2016). Optimalisasi Penggunaan Asap Cair Dari Tempurung Kelapa Sebagai Pengawet Alami Pada Ikan Segar. Jurnal Reka Buana, 2(1), 11–18.

[3] Daniella, R., Maria, D., Tobing, L., Defiani, M. R., Made, N., Parwanayoni, S., & Jimbaran, B. (2021). Uji daya hambat asap cair tempurung kelapa (. September, 81–93.

[4] Imtihani, H. N., Wahyuono, R. A., & Permatasari, S. ana N. (2020). Biopolimer Kitosan dan Penggunaannya dalam Formulasi Obat. Graniti.

[5] Yulita, Y., Asfar, I. T., Asfar, I. A., Nurannisa, A., Riska, A., Hasmariyanti, H., & Masri, M. (2024). Asap Cair dari Serbuk Gergaji dan Sekam Padi. CV. Karya Bakti Makmur Indonesia.

[6] Darweesh, W. A., El- Razik Mohamed, S. A., Emam, W. M., El Moniem, O. A., & El-Khateeb, M. A. (2020). Evaluation of antibacterial activity of chitosan against different bacterial strains. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 63(7), 2565–2575. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2019.20467.2227

[7] Ariyanti, L. M., Masfria, M., and Muchlisyam, M. (2024). Antibacterial Activity by Diffusion and Dilution Methods of Liquid Smoke Cocos nucifera L. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(5), 87–92. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20240511

[8] Dewi Perwito Sari, Prastyana, B. R., & Hardani, P. T. (2022). Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri Kitosan Dari Cangkang Bellamya Javanica. Medical Sains?: Jurnal Ilmiah Kefarmasian, 7(3), 485–490. https://doi.org/10.37874/ms.v7i3.363

[9] Sasongko, P., Mushollaeni dan Herman, W., Studi Teknologi Industri Pertanian, P., & Pertanian, F. (2014). Aktivitas Antibakteri Asap Cair Dari Limbah Tempurung Kelapa Terhadap Daging Kelinci Asap. Buana Sains, 14(2), 193–197.

[10] Dompeipen, E. J., Kaimudin, M., & Dewa, R. P. (2016). Isolasi kitin dan kitosan dari limbah kulit udang. Majalah Biam, 12(01), 32–39.

[11] Rahmi, R., Lubis, S., Adlim, M., Lelifajri, L., Zahra, N. A., & Fathana, H. (2023). Pemanfaatan Selulosa dari Bahan Alam Pada Pembuatan Komposit Kitosan. Syiah Kuala University Press.

[12] Yulistiani, R., Winarti, S., & Irawati, E. (2013). Pengujian Mikrobiologi Fillet Ikan Bandeng pada Penyimpanan Suhu Refrigator. Hasil Penelitian J. REKAPANGAN, 7(2), 257–274.

[13] Confederat, L. G., Tuchilus, C. G., Dragan, M., Sha’at, M., & Dragostin, O. M. (2021). Preparation and Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan and Its Derivatives: A Concise Review. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 26(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123694

[14] Hanafiah, M., Faisal, M., & Machdar, I. (2018). POTENSI PEMANFAATAN KITOSAN TERMODIFIKASIASAP CAIR SEBAGAI BAHAN EDIBLE COATING ANTI MIKROBA UNTUK PENGAWETAN DAGING. 7(2), 6–11.

[15] Rahayu, S., Bintoro, V. P., & Kusrahayu. (2012). Tingkat Kesukaan Dendeng Sapi Selama Penyimpanan. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan, 1(4), 108–114.

[16] Bashabsheha, R. H. F., Al-Fawarez, O., Natsheh, I., Bdeir, R., Al-Khreshieh, & Bashabsheh. (2023). Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and application of nano-therapeutics as a promising approach to combat methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens and Global Health, 118(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2023.2285187

[17] Hastuti, H. (2020). Pengawasan Mutu Hasil Perikanan Melalui Pengujian Staphylococcus aureus. Guepedia.

[18] Eissa, M. (2024). Escherichia coli: Epidemiology, Impact, Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevention: A review. Journal of Public Health and Community Medicine, 1(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.5455/jphcm.20240110064652

[19] Faridz, R., Hafiluddin, H., & Anshari, M. (2007). Analisis Jumlah Bakteri dan Keberadaan Escherichia coli pada Pengolahan Ikan Teri Nasi di PT. Kelola Mina Laut Unit Sumenep. EMBRYO, 4(2), 94–106.

[20] Kurniasih, M., & Kartika, D. (2009). AKTIVITAS ANTIBAKTERI KITOSAN TERHADAP BAKTERI S.aureus. Molekul, 4(1), 1–5.

[21] Ke, C. L., Deng, F. S., Chuang, C. Y., & Lin, C. H. (2021). Antimicrobial actions and applications of Chitosan. Polymers, 13(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060904

[22] Hassan, M. A., Omer, A. M., Abbas, E., Baset, W. M. A., & Tamer, T. M. (2018). Preparation, physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial activities of novel two phenolic chitosan Schiff base derivatives. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29650-w

[23] Zhou, G., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Wen, X., Peng, H., Peng, R., Shi, Q., Xie, X., & Li, L. (2023). Outer Membrane Porins Contribute to Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Microorganisms, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071690

[24] Chang, A. K. T., Frias, R. R., Alvarez, L. V., Bigol, U. G., & Guzman, J. P. M. D. (2019). Comparative antibacterial activity of commercial chitosan and chitosan extracted from Auricularia sp. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 17, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.016

[25] Nurin, L. A., & Trimulyono, G. (2019). Pengaruh Pemberian Asap Cair Kulit Kacang Tanah (Arachis hypogea) terhadap Pertumbuhan Bakteri pada Ikan Cakalang (Katsuwonus pelamis). LenteraBio: Berkala Ilmiah …. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/lenterabio/article/view/28639

[26] Kurniawan, K., & Syila, S. (2021). Kandungan Bakteri (Escherichia coli) Protein Dan Total Asam Laktat Pada Pembuatan Fermentasi Rusip Ikan Teri (Stolephorus sp.). Jambura Fish Processing Journal, 3(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.37905/jfpj.v3i2.10563

[27] Suryani, R., Rizal, W. A., Pratiwi, D., & Prasetyo, D. J. (2020). BIOMASSA KAYU PUTIH (MELALEUCA LEUCADENDRA) DAN KAYU JATI (TECTONA GRANDIS) Characteristics and Antibacterial Activity of Liquid Smoke From White Wood (Melaleuca leucadendra) and Teak Wood (Tectona grandis) Biomass. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian, 21(2), 106–117.

[28] Rahmasari, Y., & Yemi?, G. P. (2022). Characterization of ginger starch-based edible films incorporated with coconut shell liquid smoke by ultrasound treatment and application for ground beef. Meat Science, 188(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108799

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.